Age. (1985)patibility within the moms and dad-newborn relationships: Sources and processes

Mutton, Yards. Age., & Gilbride, K. For the W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and you may in conflict relationships (pp. 33-60). Nyc: Springer-Verlag. [ Links ]

Sensed resemblance and you may relationship victory one of dating people: An idiographic approach

Lee, L., Loewenstein, G., Ariely, D., Hong, J., & More youthful, J. (2008). If I am not hot, will you be sizzling hot or not?: Physical-elegance product reviews and you will relationships choices just like the a function of your very own attractiveness. Psychological Research, 19, 669677. [ Backlinks ]

Levinger, Grams., & Rands, Meters. (1985)patibility in-marriage and other romantic relationship. In W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and incompatible matchmaking (pp. 309-331). Nyc: Springer-Verlag. [ Website links ]

Lewin, K., Dembo, T., Festinger, L., & Sears, P. (1944). Quantity of aspiration. Inside the J. McV. See (Ed.), Identity and the conclusion disorders (Vol. 1, pp. 333378). Nyc: Ronald Drive. [ Hyperlinks ]

Loving, T. J. (2006). Anticipating matchmaking dating future with insiders’ and you will outsiders’ angle: Whom and you may what exactly is asked issues. Individual Matchmaking, 13, 349-362. [ Backlinks ]

Luo, S., & Klohnen, Age. C. (2005). Assortative mating and relationship top quality during the newly wedded couples: A few created strategy. Journal from Character and you may Public Psychology, 88, 304-326. [ Backlinks ]

Madden, Meters., & Lenhart, A good. (2006). Internet dating. Arizona, DC: Declaration for the Pew Sites & Western Lifestyle Enterprise. Retrieved , away from [ Links ]

MacDonald, T. K., & Ross, Meters. (1999). Examining the accuracy of predictions in the matchmaking relationship: Just how and why carry out lovers’ predictions vary from those created by observers? Identity and Social Psychology Bulletin, twenty five, 14171429. [ Links ]

ater, J., & Smith, S. (1982). Legitimizing facts on the initiation off heterosexual dating. Report presented in the First In the world Fulfilling for the Private Relationship, Madison, WI. [ Backlinks ]

Merkle, Age.R., & Richardson, Roentgen.A. (2000). Digital relationship and you may digital relating: Conceptualizing computer mediated intimate matchmaking. Family unit members, forty two, 187-192. [ Backlinks ]

Montoya, Roentgen. Meters., Horton, R. S., & Kirchner, J. (2008). Was real similarity essential for destination? A meta-analysis from real and you will identified similarity. Diary away from Personal and private Dating, twenty-five, 889-922. [ Website links ]

Morry, M. Yards. (2005). Matchmaking satisfaction given that a good predictor of similarity feedback; A test of your interest-resemblance theory. Journal out-of Social and private Relationships, twenty-two, 561-584. [ Hyperlinks ]

Record out of Societal and personal Relationship, 23, 865-880

Morry, Meters. Yards. (2007). New destination-similarity theory certainly mix-sex family unit members: Dating pleasure, observed similarities, and you can thinking-offering thinking. Journal out of Personal and personal Dating, 24, 117-138. [ Links ]

Murstein, B. We. (1987). An explanation and you can extension of one’s SVR concept off dyadic combining. Log away from ily, 49, 929-947. [ Website links ]


Orbuch, T. L., Veroff, J. Hassan, H., & Horrocks, J. (2002). That will split up: Good 14-year longitudinal study of black couples and you can light lovers. Diary off Social and private Matchmaking, 19, 179-202. [ Website links ]

Orenstein, S. (). The fresh love formula Meets believes it’s got discover a formula to possess governing the web dating business: A scientific strategy for finding Mr. otherwise Ms. Right. Team dos.0 Magazine. Recovered on out of [ Hyperlinks ]

Rammstedt, B., & Schupp, J. (2008). Only the congruent survive – Personality similarities in people. Identity and you may Individual Distinctions, forty five, 533-535. [ Links ]

Regan, P. C., Levin, L., Sprecher, S., Christopher, S., & Cate, Roentgen. (2000). Partner preferences: Just what services manage everyone attention within their small-identity sexual and you will enough time-identity close partners? Diary regarding Psychology and you will Human Sexuality, twelve, 1-21. [ Backlinks ]

Reis, H. T. (1985). The newest character of one’s mind regarding the initiation and you will course of societal communications. Within the W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and you can in conflict relationships (pp. 209-231). Ny: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Website links ]